Swiss AML/KYC and customer due diligence
FINMA explains that it supervises AMLA compliance by prudentially supervised banks. Swiss financial intermediaries must verify customer identity and the beneficial owner of assets, further investigate the background and purpose of transactions in unusual or high-risk relationships, and fulfill applicable recordkeeping and reporting obligations. This is a baseline for the Swiss jurisdiction, not ZKB’s publicly disclosed account-opening review threshold.
Source:FINMA — Combating money laundering ↗
UBO, source of funds and high-risk relationship review
FINMA specifically refers to the Swiss Banks’ Code of Conduct with Regard to the Exercise of Due Diligence (CDB 20) concerning the verification of contracting-party identity and identification of beneficial owners. For unusual transactions, funds suspected to be of criminal origin, or relationships involving high-risk countries or politically exposed persons, the Swiss AML rules described by FINMA require more detailed clarification. Applicants should prepare accurate, verifiable information on ownership and source of funds; general advice must not be presented as a specific ZKB document checklist.
Source:FINMA — Combating money laundering ↗
CRS/AEOI tax-residency information reporting
Switzerland’s AEOI legal framework entered into force on 2017-1-1 and is implemented by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration; Switzerland generally implements it under the MCAA and, for the EU, under bilateral agreements, with relationships updated according to official lists. Relevant financial institutions collect account information for tax residents of participating jurisdictions in accordance with applicable rules. Whether a particular applicant is reportable and how account information is handled should be confirmed based on tax residence and the bank’s forms.
Source:Swiss State Secretariat for International Finance — Automatic exchange of information on financial accounts ↗
U.S. Customers and FATCA (Distinct from CRS)
The Swiss Bankers Association explains that current U.S.–Swiss FATCA arrangements use Model 2, under which Swiss financial institutions report relevant accounts directly to the IRS. The Association says that the planned transition to Model 1 is expected to take place in 2027, but requires domestic legislation. FATCA is a U.S. tax regime separate from CRS/AEOI; this does not support claiming that the United States has joined CRS. U.S. taxpayers should confirm ZKB’s specific reporting and documentation requirements with the bank.
Source:Swiss Bankers Association — Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) ↗
Swiss sanctions-list screening
Swiss SECO provides a consolidated list and search tool for sanctioned individuals, companies, and organizations; SECO also explains that the search tool shows only directly sanctioned parties and does not provide information on potential ownership or control relationships. Local-list screening therefore cannot replace compliance assessments of control relationships and other applicable sanctions rules; this is a jurisdictional compliance baseline and does not claim to have verified ZKB’s specific internal screening system.
Source:SECO — Searching for subjects of sanctions and overall list ↗
Deposit protection, state guarantees and privacy
ZKB’s legal information page states that its deposits are protected under the Swiss deposit protection scheme, up to CHF 100,000 per customer per institution, and that the Canton of Zurich guarantee applies to liabilities if the bank’s own funds are insufficient, excluding subordinated liabilities. The page also states that the bank processes personal data; further details are available in its privacy notice and the terms and conditions for each product and service. This records only what the website discloses and does not expand on the scope of protection or eligibility in individual cases.
Source:ZKB — General Information ↗;OECD — Switzerland Information on Tax Identification Numbers ↗